Present: Commissioners Sherry Bohn, Fred Duckwall, Don Hosford, Hoby Streich, and Kathy Watson; Attorney Jerry Jaques (arriving at 8:25 p.m.); from staff, David Harlan, Mike Doke, Linda Hull, Linda Shames, and Laurie Borton

Absent: None

Media: None

1. CALL TO ORDER: President Bohn called the regular meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Executive Director David Harlan reported that Attorney Jerry Jaques would be late as he was presenting testimony at a County Commission meeting.

a) Introductions: Jennifer Donnelly, Bob Francis, Chris Gann, and Linda Maddox introduced themselves to the Commission and staff and were welcomed to the meeting.

b) Modifications, Additions to Agenda by Commissioners: Commissioner Streich requested discussion items under Commissioner Information regarding the City of Hood River parking structure and the current lease with Luhr Jensen & Sons, Inc. Executive Director David Harlan requested an Action Item addition regarding Goal 5.

2. Election of 2005-2006 Officers:
Motion: Move to re-appoint Sherry Bohn as Commission President.
Move: Duckwall
Second: Watson
Discussion: Commissioner Duckwall then recommended the reappointment of the Commissioners to the current positions (President-Bohn; Vice President-Duckwall; Secretary-Hosford; Treasurer-Streich). Hearing no objection, Duckwall amended his motion.
Amended Motion: Move to re-elect the current slate of officers for 2005-2006.
Move: Duckwall
Second: Hosford
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

a) Committee Appointments: President Bohn commented that committee appointments would be announced at the July 19 meeting.

3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Motion: Move to approve the June 21, 2005 regular session meeting minutes.
Move: Duckwall
Second: Streich
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

5. INFORMATION-COMMUNICATIONS:
a) Guests: None

b) Executive Director's Report:
· Bridge Update: A final report on the Exit 64 East Hood River Interchange Study has been issued by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and Executive Director Harlan commented that the report is available on ODOT's website. The report identifies the Port's proposed frontage road running parallel and to the north of I-84 as the preferred option for taking local trips off the freeway as opposed to significantly more expensive alternatives that greatly increase traffic backups at Button Junction. The report is projecting a 50% increase in traffic by the year 2025, and Commission Hosford commented that increased traffic was also discussed at the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association conference he recently attended. Harlan cautioned that an ODOT endorsement doesn't necessarily correlate to a financial obligation from the agency.
· Waterfront Industrial/Planning: Harlan reported on the initial meeting between KPFF Consulting Engineers and the City regarding the Second Street Extension Project. Before the project can be bid, a follow-up meeting will have to be scheduled for final review of the plans that require some minor tweaking and incorporating the City's storm water maintenance system into the design.
The Port met the Chamber's June 30 deadline request to modify their lease agreement to reflect the conference room as being part of the Visitors Center, thus exempting the room from the County's tax rolls.
Harlan reported that a summary report of the Department of Land Conservation and Development's assessment of the problems associated with the Waterfront rezoning process should be available by the end of the month. Harlan commented that the Portland State University consultant completed approximately 20 interviews.
While nothing official has been received, Harlan stated he understood Oregon State Park funding had been granted to applicants who had been on the radar much longer than the Lot 6 Park Development Committee. Harlan also commented that Port attorney Jerry Jaques and City attorney Alexandra Sosnkowski had been discussing conditions that the City would impose before the Lot 6 partition could be finalized; such as Local Improvement District (LID) funding would apply only to Parcel 2, which does not yet exist, and that it would be binding on successors.
· Waterfront Recreational: A formal response [attached] to the City's May 18 letter alleging violations of permitted uses at the Spit and the Hook and violations of the City's Goal 5 ordinance at the Spit was mailed to the City Manager on July 1. Harlan reported that he hoped to meet again with Bob Francis after July 12 to clarify several issues before moving forward with a rezoning application. Commissioner Hosford asked how long it would take before the road maintenance costs were recovered and suggested that it would be appropriate to consider bumping up the user fees at the Spit next year.
Harlan provided the Commission a draft copy of the Port's testimony regarding the City's proposed ESEE (economic, social, environmental and energy) amendments to Goal 5 Ordinance 1854. President Bohn will be representing the Port at the July 6 City Planning Commission public hearing. Jennifer Donnelly, Senior Planner with the City of Hood River Planning Department, requested to review a copy of the letter stating she would be better prepared to answer the Commissioners questions about the changes being proposed by the City that would add greater or more specific setback protections involving the Port's Spit, Hook, boat basin, and Marina properties. President Bohn informed Donnelly that a copy of the draft would be provided after the Commission had had an opportunity to review the document.
Harlan reported that a windsurfer avoiding a daily user fee at the Event Site damaged a fence at Luhr Jensen & Sons and that a police report had been filed. Harlan informed the Commission that the pump at the fuel dock is inoperable at the present time but that discussions are underway with a party interested in operating the fuel concession at the marina. The Port is working with the Gorge Technology Alliance in marketing the former Mid-Columbia Marina building and that "For Lease" signs will be placed on the building.
· Wasco Business Park: The occupancy date for the Wasco Business Park building has been moved from August 1 to mid August; Harlan said Humanities Software is aware of, and okay with, the revised schedule. Additional change orders will be considered later in the agenda during Action Items.
· John Weber Business Park: Harlan reported that real estate discussions would take place during Executive Session.
· Airport: Harlan reported that real estate discussions would take place during Executive Session.
· Other: Harlan reported that discussions at the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association conference he and Commissioner Hosford attended focused on dams, permitting, and funding challenges. Hosford commented on a study presented by the Oregon Economic & Community Development Department (OECDD) that also indicates traffic will increase over the next 5 to 10 years and that a cooperative, regional effort to address the effects of the increased truck traffic will be more effective than individual state efforts. The Commission was asked to review the Public Contracting resolutions that would be on the July 19 meeting agenda as Action Items and to contact staff if they had any questions. Harlan commented on a housing study commissioned by Hood River County and his review of the draft document indicates a much greater need for owner-units and renter-units if the casino is built in Cascade Locks. The Commission was reminded of the governance work session scheduled for July 11 at the Hood River Inn's Mountain View Room, beginning at 8:30 a.m.
Bob Francis was recognized by President Bohn and requested that a copy of the Port's draft response to the ESEE hearing be given to Jennifer Donnelly in order that she be prepared to discuss the Port's concerns once Attorney Jaques arrived at the meeting. President Bohn and Director Harlan granted Francis's request.

c) Commissioner, Committee Reports:
· Commissioner Streich commented a study is underway to find a solution to the parking problems downtown and asked if the Commission would want to consider a joint effort with the City? Streich believes this would be a win-win situation and feels the Port should take a proactive stand by sending a letter to the City signed by the Executive Director. Streich also stated that a partnership would be a great Return on Investment (ROI) opportunity for the Port as well as a positive public relations effort. Commissioner Watson stated she would like to have a role in the successful solution to the parking problem, and Commissioner Hosford stated he did not have a problem in showing an interest. President Bohn also indicated that it would not hurt to show our support; however, Commissioner Duckwall asked how the Port's involvement fit into our priority of job creation for our own industrial sites, stating further that an employee on the waterfront would not use a downtown parking structure. Commissioner Streich responded to Duckwall's comment by saying the job creation is within our Port district.
· Commissioner Streich then commented that a constituent had approached him with a concern about contaminants at the Luhr Jensen & Sons, Inc. waterfront manufacturing location. As the landowner and leaseholder, Streich questioned the Port's responsibility to the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) if there are cleanup costs?
Executive Director Harlan requested the downtown parking and Luhr Jensen issues be addressed in the form of a motion under Action Items so there was a clear understanding of the direction the Commission was requesting of staff.

· President Bohn voiced her concern to City Manager Bob Francis about the traffic problems associated with the Downtown Business Association's "First Friday" event on July 1. Bohn commented that both resident and tourist frustrations were compounded by the volumes of summer traffic downtown and at Exit 64, the start of a holiday weekend, Thomas the Tank Engine visitors, and First Friday street closures downtown.

Before proceeding onto the Goal 5 ESEE amendments discussion, President Bohn recessed the meeting at 8:00 p.m. to await the arrival of Attorney Jaques, who was still at the Board of County Commissioners meeting. Upon Commission consensus, the meeting reconvened at 8:12 p.m. to continue with Action Items.

6. ACTION ITEMS:

a) Humanities Change Orders:

Motion: Move to approve Change Order numbers 21, 24, 25 and 26 for the Wasco Business Park building in the total amount of $8,488.15.
Move: Duckwall
Second: Hosford
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

b) Chamber of Commerce Lease Ratification:

Motion: Move to ratify the Lease Amendment dated June 30, 2005 with the Hood River County Chamber of Commerce for leased space at the Expo Center.
Move: Duckwall
Second: Watson
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

c) Accounts Payable:

Motion: Move to approve Accounts Payable in the amount of $3,153.58 for travel expense reimbursement to Commissioner Bohn.
Move: Hosford
Second: Duckwall
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

d) City of Hood River Parking Structure:

Motion: Move to direct staff to draft a letter of interest and co-partner on a parking structure with the City of Hood River.
Move: Streich
Second: Hosford
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

e) Luhr Jensen & Sons, Inc. Lease:

Motion: Move to direct staff to investigate the lease with Luhr Jensen & Sons, Inc. regarding the Port's obligation of contaminant cleanup, if there is any, pursuant to a constituent request.
Move: Streich
Second: Watson
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

f) Ordinance 1854 - ESEE Amendments: Commissioner Watson inquired what prompted the City to propose amendments to their Goal 5 ordinance? Jennifer Donnelly, City of Hood River Senior Planner, commented that the City Planning Commission was directed by the City Council to review the "reaches" out of respect for concerns of the public after voters in the City approved last November's referendum. While that initiative was subsequently ruled to be illegal, the City wanted to "respect the will of the voters," Donnelly stated. Commissioner Hosford emphasized that the referendum Donnelly referenced was not a Port-wide vote. Commissioner Streich asked Donnelly if an Open Space zoning would allow kiting, which she confirmed but stated that Open Space, which is similar to Recreational zoning, is more protective. Commissioner Duckwall then argued that the Spit visually looks Recreational and not open space. Commissioner Watson asked Donnelly if an Open Space zone allowed for park land, which Donnelly confirmed was allowed. President Bohn stated the Port's intent was to request a rezone of the Spit and the Hook to correspond with the Event Site zone, which is Recreational/Commercial. Donnelly stated the Port had two opportunities to present its comments - at the July 6 Planning Commission meeting and the July 25 City Council meeting. President Bohn will attend the July 6 meeting to present testimony on behalf of the Port of Hood River that coincides with the concerns outlined in the draft letter that will be finalized and presented to City of Hood River Senior Planner Jennifer Donnelly:
1) 25-foot setback along the inner edge of the Marina (75-foot setback proposed);
2) "Bankfull stage" setback requirements should be referenced as per Oregon Administrative Rules relating to riparian areas ("top of bank" now referenced);
3) Maintenance of existing or permitted roads and existing or permitted parking areas language modification ("maintenance of existing roads" is referenced currently in Chapter 17.22);
4) Dedication of right of ways language needs to be restored (reference dropped from Chapter 17.22);
5) Requesting clarification of item 4 ("core" and "physical barrier") referenced on the last page of the proposed revised Goal 5 policies; and
6) Applications for rezoning the Spit and the Hook will be submitted as Recreational/Commercial, as already discussed with the City Manager and City Attorney (City has made reference to a rezone as Open Space).

Motion: Move to approve the substance of the draft letter as the basis for the Port's testimony before the City Planning Commission's July 6 hearing on Ordinance 1854 - ESEE Amendments.
Move: Duckwall
Second: Hosford
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Duckwall, Hosford, Streich, and Watson
MOTION CARRIED

6. ANNOUNCEMENTS: A request was made by President Bohn of City Manager Bob Francis to keep the Port informed regarding the potential relocation of a cell tower from the back of the Wastewater Treatment Plant to a more visible location. Bohn stated her concern was not with the tower itself, but with the "ugly" building associated with the tower.

7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: President Bohn called the Commission into Executive Session under ORS 192.660(2)(e) Real Property at 8:30 p.m. Upon conclusion of Executive Session, the Commission was called back into Regular Session at 9:40 p.m. No action was taken as a result of Executive Session.

8. ADJOURN: President Bohn adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m.

---

Minutes of July 19, 2005 Regular Session Meeting
Port of Hood River Commission
Expo Center Conference Room, 7:00 P.M.

Present: Commissioners Sherry Bohn, Hoby Streich, and Kathy Watson; Attorney Jerry Jaques; from staff, David Harlan, Mike Doke, Linda Hull, and Laurie Borton

Absent: Commissioners Fred Duckwall, and Don Hosford; from staff, Linda Shames

Media: None

1. CALL TO ORDER: President Bohn called the regular meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. Bohn reviewed the meeting agenda with Commissioners Streich and Watson stating that Action Items would be covered, and the Director's Report and Goal 5 work session would be rescheduled for Tuesday, July 26, with all Commissioners in attendance.

a) Introductions: Andy Ball, Jim Schlemmer, Linda Maddox, Denny Kendig and Anne Yannotti introduced themselves and were welcomed to the meeting by President Bohn.
.
b) Modifications, Additions to Agenda by Commissioners: None.

2. PUBLIC COMMENT: FBO operators Anne Yannotti and Denny Kendig of Flightline Services provided the Commission with a letter of request for financial support [attached] for the September 16-17, 2005 "Hood River Airport Days." Kendig reported the annual fly-in alternates between the Hood River and The Dalles airports. Yannotti commented that organizations that use, and depend on, the Ken Jernstedt Airfield have been invited to participate. Kendig and Yannotti requested a $1,000 donation to help pay for fueling, equipment rental, publicity and mailings and commented that any money not used would be refunded. Commissioner Watson inquired if the donation was a budgeted item to which Executive Director David Harlan responded that it included under marketing. President Bohn asked if the Port would be listed as a fly-in sponsor and Yannotti stated that the Port and Port logo would be included on the poster. President Bohn stated that a decision would be made under Action Items on the agenda and thanked Kendig and Yannotti for coming to the meeting.

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Motion: Move to approve the meeting minutes of the July 5, 2005 regular session.
Move: Streich
Second: Watson
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Streich, and Watson
Absent: Duckwall, and Hosford
MOTION CARRIED

5. ACTION ITEMS:

b) Fly-in Funding Request:

Motion: Move to approve Flightline Services request for a $1,000 donation to help with expenses for the September 16-17, 2005 "Hood River Airport Days."
Move: Watson
Second: Streich
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Streich, and Watson
Absent: Duckwall, and Hosford
MOTION CARRIED

a) Public Contracting Resolution Nos. 2005-06-1 and 2005-06-2: Executive Director Harlan commented the revised state Public Contracting Code took effect March 1, 2005 and staff had been working with Attorney Jerry Jaques to draft a policy for the Port. Jaques commented the policy allows for flexibility yet is still consistent with the state's code. Jaques answered questions from the Commission and commented the Commission had the discretion to modify the policy.

Motion: Move to approve Resolution No. 2005-06-1 adopting Public Contracting Rules and Rules of Procedure for Public Contracting; and Resolution No. 2005-06-2 establishing Procedural Rules for Personal Services Contracts.
Move: Watson
Second: Streich
Approved: Aye: Bohn, Streich, and Watson
Absent: Duckwall, and Hosford
MOTION CARRIED

c) Fuel Dock Project: Because local and guest boaters have been without a convenient fueling station since the first of June, Executive Director Harlan stated it would be in the public's best interest to declare the pump replacement project as a contract required by emergency circumstances, which is allowed under the newly adopted public contracting rules. Harlan also commented that the Oregon State Marine Board had confirmed that costs expended for the pump and installation would go towards the Port's match for the fuel dock upgrade grant request. There was Commission consensus that a new pump, rather than a refurbished pump, should be purchased. Harlan also reported that fuel concession discussions are continuing and he hoped to have an agreement in place by the time the new fuel pump was installed.

Motion: Move to replace the marina fuel pump for a not-to-exceed amount of $10,000, and, to declare an emergency in the best interest of the public.
Move: Streich
Second: Watson
Approved: Aye: Bohn, Streich, and Watson
Absent: Duckwall, and Hosford
MOTION CARRIED

d) Accounts Payable:

Motion: Move to approve Accounts Payable in the total amount of $12,700 for annual professional membership dues to Pacific Northwest Waterways Association (PNWA), and Oregon Ports Group.
Move: Streich
Second: Watson
Vote: Aye: Bohn, Streich, and Watson
Absent: Duckwall, and Hosford
MOTION CARRIED

6. ANNOUNCEMENTS: President Bohn stated a Goal 5 work session would be scheduled for Tuesday, July 26, 2005 with the full Commission present to prepare further testimony for the August 8 City Council hearing on the City's proposed ESEE amendments to Ordinance 1854. Written testimony had already been presented to the Planning Commission at a July 6 meeting, which Bohn attended. Bohn commented the Executive Director's Report would also be included on the June 26 agenda.

7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: None.

8. ADJOURN: President Bohn adjourned the meeting at 7:20 p.m.

---

Minutes of July 26, 2005 Port of Hood River Commission Special Meeting
Expo Center Conference Room
6:30 P.M.

Present: Commissioners Sherry Bohn, Fred Duckwall, Don Hosford, Hoby Streich, and Kathy Watson; Attorney Jerry Jaques; from staff, David Harlan, Mike Doke, Linda Shames, Linda Hull, and Laurie Borton; guests Joe Sheirbon, John Benton, and Linda Maddox.

Absent: None

Media: RaeLynn Ricarte, Hood River News

President Bohn called the Special Meeting to order at 6:37 p.m. for the purpose of discussing a motion made at the July 5 meeting regarding a parking structure partnership with the City of Hood River, and continuing discussions with respect to the City's proposed Goal 5 ESEE (economic, social, environmental and energy) amendments.

1. Parking Structure. Executive Director David Harlan stated the Port had limitations in direct funding of a parking structure and provided the Commission with comments from Attorney Jerry Jaques that referenced provisions under ORS 777.113 that indicated the Port may "provide research or technical assistance for the planning, promotion or implementation of commercial, industrial or economic development projects upon request by any public body within the boundaries of the Port." President Bohn recapped a July 25 Real Estate Committee discussion of the parking structure stating it was the intent of the Commission's motion to support the study and partner with the City but not necessarily fund the project. Commissioner Streich, who initiated the discussion and subsequent motion "to direct staff to draft a letter of interest and co-partner on a parking structure with the City of Hood River," stated he is always looking for investment opportunities and his intent was to make the City aware, in the form of a generic letter, that the Port was interested and supportive of their study. Commissioner Watson commented that while the Port may not always participate directly it was her opinion that the Port should assist if projects impact or effect the Port's ability to attract new businesses to the community. Commissioner Hosford reiterated his vote to take a look at the project. Commissioner Duckwall restated his position in favor of a generic letter of support adding that at a later date the Port could choose to assist the City in their effort to secure funding for a downtown parking structure.

It was the consensus of the Commission that the Port should submit a generic letter of support to the City of Hood River's study of a downtown parking structure and offer assistance as allowed by statute.

2. Goal 5. Executive Director Harlan reported the August 8 City Council meeting will hear recommendations resulting from the City Planning Commission's July 6 hearing on "a blanket 100-foot setback on all reaches with encroachment for specific uses in the last 25 feet, subject to a Conditional Use Permit," as well as requesting the Council consider "a new open space zone be created for potential rezoning of the Hook and Spit that will prohibit permanent structures other than restrooms, allow transient vending, and enhance pedestrian access." Harlan did comment that he anticipated receiving correspondence from City Manager Bob Francis indicating the City's August 1 deadline to apply for a rezone has been postponed.
Harlan expressed his concern that the Planning Commission's recommendation would toss out the entire purpose and intent of the ESEE analysis. In the best interest of the Port, in July 2004 (reference July 6, 2004 regular meeting minutes), the Port agreed to become involved with the City's Goal 5 inventory in hopes of moving the draft waterfront zoning ordinance process forward. President Bohn commented on the public's perception that the Port "bought the results" but Harlan jokingly responded that the outcome should have been more favorable concluding that only two out of fourteen reaches required little or no riparian protection for the Port's $43,000. Harlan stated he was also concerned that the Planning Commission may seek to bar the frontage road concept of taking local trips off I-84, which would have a negative impact on public safety and raised other questions since the City Council provided a letter of support for preliminary engineering and design for the Frontage Road Crossing Project.
Harlan acknowledged that others might not share his assessment but stated he believes the City planning process is broken. Given that Waterfront Zoning Ordinance 1851, which did not require riparian protection, was shelved it now appears the Planning Commission is seeking to impose some aspects of 1851 by other means. Given City Planning staff's recommendation essentially amounted to abandoning the ESEE agreement, and a rezone recommendation for the Hook and Spit prior to maintenance work being done by the Port, Harlan additionally cited Planning Commission minutes (April 13, 2005) and mandates from City staff (City letter dated May 18, 2005) as examples for his assessment that planning staff was more concerned with control than protection. Harlan and Attorney Jerry Jaques commented they believed recent dealings with the City manager and counsel have been good and that mutual agreement had been reached but issues they thought were off the table are now back. President Bohn commented on her surprise that the testimony she presented at the July 6 Planning Commission hearing was not included in their draft minutes. Bohn also stated she believed the Port and City had come to terms with "bankfull stage" and rezoning the Spit and Hook to Recreational/Commercial and was surprised that those two issues were reopened for discussion. Bohn stated that she had talked with current and prospective property owners in the affected areas who used "takings" language in their conversations. Bohn emphasized it should not be necessary for the Port to go that route.
Commissioner Duckwall stressed the City and Port had an agreement based on a technical analysis and there was absolutely no reason for the Port to change its stand on Goal 5. Duckwall further stated that the City should not rely on the bully pulpit of a city-only electoral vote. Commissioner Hosford strongly agreed with Duckwall and commented that the silent majority was tired of the vocal minority. Hosford recommended that City Council be encouraged to maintain its stand on Goal 5 as approved by the Oregon Department of Land, Conservation and Development (DLCD). Executive Director Harlan added that the City should not discount the margin of victory in the recent Commissioner election. Harlan also stated it was his belief that it didn't matter if it was the opinion of the Planning Commission or Planning staff, attention should not be paid to an illegal referendum (Ballot Measure 14-22).

Commissioner Watson believed it would not serve any purpose to place blame on City staff and that the Commission should communicate directly with the City Council. Watson stated she was told that the Planning Commission's uncertainty was due to not understanding where the Port was going once Waterfront Zoning Ordinance 1851 was shelved. Watson stated the Port's testimony at the August 8 City Council meeting should include Strategic Plan statements related to view corridor protections and building height restrictions, and that the Council be urged not to make changes in a vacuum environment and allow the Port time to Master Plan the waterfront.
Harlan stated that while he accepted Watson's comment not to focus on staff, he still believed a control issue existed that was inappropriate and was supported by the receipt of an apology letter from the City Manager regarding a Planning staffer's comments. Harlan commented that the Port and City have had good working relationships but stated that he was frustrated because the Port does not seem to get anything in return and cited the Barman property purchase, which the City urged the Port to buy and the Lot 6 park land donation, which has not been the only donation made to the City, as examples. Harlan stated he felt that keeping the current industrial zone was not enough, and the Lot 6 donation has not brought peace. President Bohn casually stated a 100-foot setback across the entire waterfront would make an even bigger park. Commissioner Watson said it would be a mistake to talk about the park as a bargaining chip and did not want a discussion with the City regarding reversion, stating further that the Port's return was an increased value to the community. Commissioner Duckwall commented the entire process has not been give and take and pointed out there have been no compromises on the part of the City. Watson again urged to refrain from this dialogue and stated the Port should ask for time to develop a Master Plan. Duckwall stated he believed it has been inappropriate for the City to challenge the Port's credibility and that it was only reasonable for the Port to take a stand on what was earlier agreed to.
After requesting clarification concerning setbacks in specific reaches and mitigation, Commissioner Streich stated it was his opinion that he did not agree with the Planning Commission's Goal 5 amendment recommendations.
There was unanimous consensus of the Commission that the Port should challenge the recommendations of the Planning Commission. President Bohn summarized that the August 8 City Council testimony should build on the presentation made to the Planning Commission to include issues such as the Port's preservation and visionary history and the current protections written into the Strategic Plan. Commissioner Watson reiterated her suggestion of requesting that the City postpone a decision on the ESEE amendments until the Port had an opportunity to draft a Master Plan for development of the waterfront.

President Bohn then recognized Joe Sheirbon. Sheirbon introduced himself as a longtime valley resident who also owns property inside the city limits, and serves as a member of the Port budget committee. Sheirbon stated that he was frustrated because no action has been taken, and he realized there hadn't been much cooperation from the City, who seems to keep moving the goal line, which be believed was unfair. Sheirbon stated it was time to "draw a line in the sand," which he acknowledged some people may perceive as being counterproductive, but Sheirbon firmly believed it needed to be done.

At 7:13 p.m., President Bohn called the Commission into Executive Session under ORS 192.660(2)(e) Real Property; and 192.660(2)(f) Exempt Documents.

The Commission was called back into Special Session at 8:06 p.m. No action was taken as a result of Executive Session.

President Bohn announced that the first regular meeting in August would be canceled and the next regular meeting would be scheduled for August 16, 2005.

President Bohn then adjourned the special meeting at 8:07 p.m.